20040919

emans frustration

I've been struggling to finish my SP for more than a week now. One of the main causes of my problem is my stupidity. Up until last night, one part of my code reads:

open ($fHandle, $fileName);
while (<$fHandle>) {
$printout .= <$fHandle>;
}
close ($fHandle);

This just puts every other line of the file to the $printout variable. I fixed it by doing this:

open ($fHandle, $fileName);
while (<$fHandle>) {
$printout .= $_;
}
close ($fHandle);

Also, i had several problems regarding where the perl interpreter is. In Linux, and most other OSes, it's in /usr/bin/perl, while in Windows, for SiePerl, it's in %Program Files%/SiePerl/perl/%version%/bin/MSWin32-x86-perlio/Perl.exe. So far i haven't solved this yet.

Last night Epoy, Biboy, and Paolo was here. They told me that they haven't seen me for a while. That's mainly because i haven't gone out for a while.

Anyway, i have to finish coding this darn thing.

20040912

Ilocos 2002

Ilocos 2002

Just got a Flickr account.
I'm just testing it.
Here's a picture of me somewhere in Ilocos, getting some fruit. Sorry, i can't remember the details. This photo was taken April of 2002, which is more than 2 years ago.


20040911

General Solution for Polynomial Equations

Could this be true?
A post in slashdot said that a Dutch student found a formula that determines the roots of any polynomial equation. Didn't have time to read the details... i just posted it to remind myself, and also to make you my "research team"... hehe... that is, to find out if this is true.
If this is true, then what the heck does Abel's proof say?

The source of this news is from Fontys school homepage. You could see the babelfish-translated page from altavista.

Also, since it's been /.ed, here's a copy of the pdf from Arxciv.

20040821

3 Weeks Torture

I've been longing for three weeks, for the sweet taste of that beauty. Three weeks, i've waited, watched, and anticipated for my turn to have her. I've been asking for her for sometime, and would do anything at the right time.

One night, though, it seemed over. One night, it seemed gone. After the long wait, after all my efforts... one kiss, one sip, one touch, even... none.

I realize that it's over, the whisky's gone.

Ode for the night

I've been on this lonely road so long, Does anybody know where it goes, I remember last time the signs pointed home, A month ago. -- Carpenters, "Road Ode"

20040811

Some things Ilonggo

From LouAnne:

Ingat - halong

"do you have something to eat?" - "may pagkaon kamu da?"

"Wanna go out?" - "gusto mo, lagaw/mag-gwa kita?"
gusto mo---do you want to
lagaw---lakwatsa, pasyal
mag-gwa---go out, go somewhere

20040730

The evolution of man

It took tens of thousands of years so that the ancestor of the man becomes a biped. A few hours of catechism or religious instruction have been enough so that it kneels or prosterne, and consequently loses his dignity.
http://atheisme.free.fr/Humour/Evolution_man.htm

20040728

Proving a universal negative

A lot of people claim that it is impossible to prove a universal negative. For example, while we may not have evidence that unicorns or dragons exist, we cannot prove that they do not exist. Unless we have a complete knowledge of the universe, we must admit the possibility that somewhere in the universe, there might be such creatures.

But the claim that omniscience is needed to prove a universal negative presumes that the concept which we are discussing is logically coherent. If the attributes which we assign to a hypothetical object or being are self-contradictory, then we can conclude that it /cannot exist/, and therefore /does not exist/. I do not need a complete knowledge of the universe to prove that cubic spheres do not exist. Such objects have mutually-exclusive attributes which make their existence impossible. A cube, by definition, has 8 corners, while a sphere has none. These properties are completely incompatible -- they cannot be held simultaneously by the same object.

Source: http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/library/cd_impossible.html

20040726

[plug] Humor: Leaked M$ Memo: The Danger of Sharing (fwd)

Community: Leaked MS Memo: The Danger of Sharing

Jul 25, 2004,

by Thad Phetteplace

The following internal memo has leaked from the highest levels of Microsoft and found its way to my desk. Sorry, I can't reveal my sources, but I am sharing it so we can all reach a better understanding of Microsoft's thinking regarding free and open source software. Enjoy. ;)
Title: The Danger of Sharing
Author: An Anonymous Microsoft Executive
Date: November 18, 2003

A dangerous plague is sweeping the land... a plague of sharing. It hides under the the seductive name of 'Free Software' or sometimes 'Open Source', but underneath it is just plain and simple sharing. I've warned the world of this threat on many occasions, but I've discovered my warnings were not broad enough. You see, this evil called sharing is not limited to just software.

You can find signs of it everywhere, along with the economic ruin that follows it. Why just the other day I discovered this place called a 'soup kitchen'. It was providing meals... for free! Just imagine the damage that would be inflicted on the restaurant industry if this soup kitchen thing catches on. The effects could already be seen in that neighborhood; all the other people in the soup line seemed very poor, and there was not a five star restaurant to be found anywhere nearby. I've even seen evidence of this sharing epidemic among our own employees. Just the other day one of the interns brought in muffins and gave them away, you guessed it, for free! Perhaps it would not have been so bad if she had actually purchased them from a bakery, but she actually admitted to baking them herself. She said she enjoyed doing it and was happy to give them away so other people could enjoy them to!

Can you imagine the impact on the bakery industry if this sort of thing catches on! But it doesn't stop there. She went on to thank several of her coworkers for helping her move into her new apartment. Yes, you heard correctly, people actually helped her move, FOR FREE. Image all the work lost to moving companies from this sort of activity.

Perhaps giving away free muffins seems like no big deal to you. After all, the damage that one person can do is limited to the number of muffins that one person can bake. The cost of production puts a cap on the amount of destructive sharing this person can do. But when we enter the realm of software and other forms of intangible 'intellectual property', the cost of production quickly bottoms out. After the first one, the rest are essentially free!

In a free software world, there is no room for Microsoft's 85 to 90 percent profit margin on Windows and Office. The company might be forced to survive on the thin 5 to 9 percent margins that most of the technology industry suffers with. Even worse, it might have to rely on other sources of revenue, like support services.

Imagine the impact to the economy if all that money currently being funneled to Microsoft software was instead left in the hands of our customers. Imagine all the ways in which those companies and home user might squander that money. I realize some of you out there will try and argue that spreading money around is better for the economy than concentrating it in one place, but that argument only holds water if someone besides Microsoft is capable of innovation, and we all know how silly that idea is.

In conclusion, we must all do our part to stop this plague of sharing. Just as surely as mechanized looms threatened the weaving industry of the early 19th century, the cooperative development methods of the so called free and open source software movements threaten our current proprietary software industry. The sharing must be stopped.

Sincerely,
Anonymous@microsoft.com